Difference between revisions of Talk:Axis
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
forgot to sign last comment
Dlskidmore (talk | contribs) (reference re-use?) |
Dlskidmore (talk | contribs) m (forgot to sign last comment) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
How do you reference the same reference twice without a new number for each? [[User:Dlskidmore|Dlskidmore]] ([[User talk:Dlskidmore|talk]]) 18:35, 25 June 2020 (UTC) | How do you reference the same reference twice without a new number for each? [[User:Dlskidmore|Dlskidmore]] ([[User talk:Dlskidmore|talk]]) 18:35, 25 June 2020 (UTC) | ||
:{{re|Dlskidmore}} I had the same question - see my talk page. You use <nowiki><ref name=xxx>...</ref></nowiki> , and then to refer back to it, you have another ref section with the same named tag, and and empty body. [[User:Divenal|Divenal]] ([[User talk:Divenal|talk]]) 11:30, 26 June 2020 (UTC) | |||
==symmetry== | |||
{{re|Dlskidmore}} your ref says that there is no symmetry between left/right. But the 2007 review {{cite journal| author=Read SA, Collins MJ, Carney LG| title=A review of astigmatism and its possible genesis. | journal=Clin Exp Optom | year= 2007 | volume= 90 | issue= 1 | pages= 5-19 | pmid=17177660 | doi=10.1111/j.1444-0938.2007.00112.x | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=17177660 }} seems to think there is | |||
ASTIGMATISM IN RIGHT AND LEFT EYES | |||
There is widespread agreement that some degree of symmetry exists between the refractive errors of right and left eyes... | |||
{{re|Divenal}} Feel free to add that there's some controversy and provide the reference with the competing view. Does that paper point to any evidence or just reference "widespread agreement"? [[User:Dlskidmore|Dlskidmore]] ([[User talk:Dlskidmore|talk]]) 17:12, 16 July 2020 (UTC) | |||