Difference between revisions of Red:Our point of view

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:


==What this policy doesn't mean==
==What this policy doesn't mean==
It does not mean that people should not investigate how eyesight works, as there is still plenty to learn about and discuss. We're confident that we know how to fix it, and while there may be some gaps in our knowledge, we think we have covered the basics. With that said, questioning is always a good idea, for anyone. Critical thinking is important, and you shouldn't [[blind belief|blindly believe things]] you read on the internet.
It does not mean that people should not investigate how eyesight works, as there is still plenty to learn about and discuss. There may be some gaps in our knowledge, but EndMyopia definitely has covered nearly anything most people should need to practically reverse their [[lens-induced myopia]], evidenced by countless [{{improvementreports}} improvement reports]. With that said, questioning is always a good idea, for anyone. Critical thinking is important, and you shouldn't [[blind belief|blindly believe things]] you read on the internet.


We hope you apply some good investigative insight, read information from many different sources about vision improvement, and '''come to your own conclusions''' about what is the best thing to do for your eyesight.
We hope you apply some good investigative insight, read information from many different sources about vision improvement, and '''come to your own conclusions''' about what is the best thing to do for your eyesight.