Difference between revisions of Red:Optometry degrees optional
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "The technical, heavy sciency content should be independent from, practical ‘tha steps’, or ‘how to reduce’ articles. Citations from clinical studies heavily encourag...") |
No edit summary |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The technical, heavy sciency content should be independent from | {{EM guideline|Red:OVERLYTECHNICAL|Red:ODO}} | ||
The technical, heavy sciency content should be independent from more practical, how to improve articles. | |||
Citations from clinical studies heavily encouraged all over the wiki (just like how Wikipedia does it). | Citations from clinical studies heavily encouraged all over the wiki (just like how Wikipedia does it). | ||
| Line 6: | Line 7: | ||
Normal people couldn't care less about your P values and correlation coefficients. :) | Normal people couldn't care less about your P values and correlation coefficients. :) | ||
{{Editing navbox}} | |||
Latest revision as of 09:14, 5 June 2023
 | This page documents an Reduced Vision Wiki guideline. It is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though it is best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply. Any substantive edit to this page should reflect consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on the talk page.
|
The technical, heavy sciency content should be independent from more practical, how to improve articles.
Citations from clinical studies heavily encouraged all over the wiki (just like how Wikipedia does it).
There should not be a heavy and detailed discussion of the mechanism of axial change with diagrams in the middle of the ‘Where to start’ article (brief mention fine).
Normal people couldn't care less about your P values and correlation coefficients. :)