Difference between revisions of Red:Our point of view

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
m (Text replacement - "EM:" to "BV:")
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{EM policy|BV:THEBEST|BV:OPOV}}{{Nutshell|EndMyopia Wiki is written from '''our point of view'''. We try to be objective in our assessment of other vision improvement methods, but if they worked better than EndMyopia '''we would be doing that instead'''.|EndMyopia Wiki is '''under no obligation''' to host material promoting other vision improvement methods.|Everyone is entitled to their own opinion! Feel free to try other methods.}}
{{EM policy|BV:THEBEST|BV:OPOV}}{{Nutshell|Reduced Lens Wiki is written from '''our point of view'''. We try to be objective in our assessment of other vision improvement methods, but if they worked better than the reduced lens method '''we would be doing that instead'''.|Reduced Lens is '''under no obligation''' to host material promoting other vision improvement methods.|Everyone is entitled to their own opinion! Feel free to try other methods.}}
[[File:Unicorn LLC.png|right|150px]]
[[File:Unicorn LLC.png|right|150px]]
Reduced Lens is written from '''our point of view'''. That means '''we think we're the best'''.


 
There are big checks and balances on thinking we're the best, however. It is not a position that the community comes to lightly, and there is plenty of internal debate over what is important and what is not important when it comes to vision improvement. However:
EndMyopia Wiki is written from '''our point of view'''. That means '''we think we're the best'''.
 
There are big checks and balances on thinking we're the best, however. It is not a position that the community comes to lightly, and there is plenty of internal debate over what is important and what is not important when it comes to vision improvement. With that said, there are quite a few things everyone 'under the banner of EM' has managed to agree on. Here are some examples:
:'''[[Eye exercises]] are largely ineffectual and a waste of time.''' The [[Bates method]] was very good for its time, and [[William Bates]] had some very good ideas about vision biology. The Bates method could be very good for relaxing the eyes.  
:'''[[Eye exercises]] are largely ineffectual and a waste of time.''' The [[Bates method]] was very good for its time, and [[William Bates]] had some very good ideas about vision biology. The Bates method could be very good for relaxing the eyes.  
::However the method as it exists does not treat the root cause of myopia as it exists in the majority of people today - which is [[axial elongation]] caused by [[lens-induced myopia]], as documented in [[clinical studies]].
::However the method as it exists does not treat the root cause of myopia as it exists in the majority of people today - which is [[axial elongation]] caused by [[lens-induced myopia]], as documented in [[clinical studies]].
Line 13: Line 11:
==Rationale==
==Rationale==
We don't want to promote content that we '''genuinely think is not worth hosting'''. You can find objective assessment of other vision improvement methods we know to be less effective on here, and the article will cover the good and bad of them. What you '''won't find''', are long love letters about how magic healing crystals will improve your eyesight. {{grey|{{resize|70%|Because they won't, as much as we wish they would...}}}}.
We don't want to promote content that we '''genuinely think is not worth hosting'''. You can find objective assessment of other vision improvement methods we know to be less effective on here, and the article will cover the good and bad of them. What you '''won't find''', are long love letters about how magic healing crystals will improve your eyesight. {{grey|{{resize|70%|Because they won't, as much as we wish they would...}}}}.
Would you expect to go to a Bates method website and see loads of positive stuff about EndMyopia? We wouldn't have thought so!


==What this policy doesn't mean==
==What this policy doesn't mean==

Navigation menu