Difference between revisions of Red:Our point of view

Red:Our point of view (view source)

199 bytes removed , 27 May 2020

rmv mention to Wikipedia in lead

6,383

edits

Revision as of 10:02, 27 May 2020 (view source) NottNott (talk \| contribs) m (NottNott moved page EndMyopia:Biased point of view to EndMyopia:Our point of view) ← Older edit		Revision as of 10:09, 27 May 2020 (view source) NottNott (talk \| contribs) (rmv mention to Wikipedia in lead) Newer edit →
Line 3:		Line 3:


	EndMyopia Wiki is written from '''our point of view'''~~. In contrast to more objective resources, such as [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia\|Wikipedia]] with their [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:NPOV\|neutral point of view]] policy, we are openly written from our point of view~~. That means '''we think we're the best'''.		EndMyopia Wiki is written from '''our point of view'''. That means '''we think we're the best'''.

	There are big checks and balances on thinking we're the best, however. It is not a position that the community comes to lightly, and there is plenty of internal debate over what is important and what is not important when it comes to vision improvement. With that said, there are quite a few things everyone 'under the banner of EM' has managed to agree on. Here are some examples:		There are big checks and balances on thinking we're the best, however. It is not a position that the community comes to lightly, and there is plenty of internal debate over what is important and what is not important when it comes to vision improvement. With that said, there are quite a few things everyone 'under the banner of EM' has managed to agree on. Here are some examples: