Difference between revisions of Guide:How to doubt the reduced lens method

Guide:How to doubt the reduced lens method (view source)

23 bytes removed , 11 June 2020

Slight rewording - defocus isn't the only possible stimulus so dial back slightly . Does it seem reasonable ?

275

edits

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 ==Causality==
-How does the [[Bates method]] address the underlying biology in reversing the [[axial length]] of the eye, for instance? There are a lot of [[clinical studies]] that just as [[hyperopic defocus]] will increase axial length and therefore myopia, [[myopic defocus]] will decrease axial length. The Bates method relies on eye exercises such as [[palming]], [[swinging]] and other things doesn't induce myopic defocus, which is the stimulus, according to clinical studies, that reduces the length of the eyeball.
+How does the [[Bates method]] address the underlying biology in reversing the [[axial elongation]] of the eye, for instance? There are [[clinical studies]] that just as [[hyperopic defocus]] can increase axial length and therefore myopia, the [[myopic defocus]] used by EndMyopia can decrease axial length. The Bates method relies on eye exercises such as [[palming]], [[swinging]] and other things which don't appear to provide a known stimulus that reduces the length of the eyeball.
 ==References==